Subscribe

China’s CJ-10 cruise missiles disclosed!

CJ-10 another name is Long Sword 10
First right is the East China Sea -10 No. In fact, not called the East China Sea -10 number, but the sword -10 No. Think about it can understand that a ground-launched cruise missiles can say whatever they can not bring seafood Son, but the This first serial number 10 is indeed used, DH10 indeed been a long time painted on the missile body, as to why it seems that the missiles should be to change the name of the location has changed, leaders took a new name for the missiles. Of all the older data for the missile DH10 words written them altogether, but the description of all the new name has been renamed the sword -10.

Let me say launch vehicle, in fact we had long ago seen the launch vehicle, and the chassis and the 03-type rockets, like the back into three missile boxes

After the talk about the range, the U.S. Department of Defense to the data is 1,500 kilometers. This number is indeed not be as accurate, but also greatly underestimated our R & D capabilities. Sword was called a long sword, because it is really a long —————— sword, give the Americans a range of 1,500 kilometers range Naishi Proving Ground range ( because the test site is only so big), the actual range go farther than this, YJ62 now turning a times the range of a fraction of the sword can not keep up.

As for the power and precision, of you read the Tomahawk could hit the image, then I say that we can play out the same effect

There is a platform issue, estimated that 10 air-ground sharing, as big cricket VLS and cock nuclear submarines, the Navy looks like other models already have a plan

(Heard on the 10th decryption, the author has been a long sigh of relief, finally said in public, in fact, behind the No. 10 has been test-fired long ago pointed cruise eggs passed)

The next phase, TG goal targets is expected to increase flexibility, reduce planning time and enrich the platform types.

Comprehensive look at his own statement:

About Model:

This model is now developed by the Navy and the Second Artillery, the name also to the Second Artillery sword play (and I am not fat version of the intent of the sea we do not seem to understand A), it is estimated that the ship is unlikely that the boat into the possibility of is no two ways about sex is 0, and the Navy has a better bomb So this more as a technical master type, derived out of other models, such a bomb as far as I know have “can be made.” As for the YJ-62, a range of hundreds of kilometers simply can not meet the needs of ocean-going navy. The reason is because 62 of some of its technical and even cruise eggs from the previous generation, so puffiness serious problem that is actually a little more than 1 ton, as far as less than 1 and a half tons to upgrade a range of difficult technical part of the sword to Since the Kh-55, the length of large, going to 2-ton and a half level, it will not fit into the VLS and submarines.

DH-10 derived model has already accomplished pilot, we at this stage the main task is to address the issue of platform, the availability of cruise missiles, as at this stage I think it is unrealistic to do fine. The new Eagle hit the technical part of the succession of YJ-62, but more also comes from the results of DH, while the 62 upward development space how much I was actually able to hold negative views, medium-sized shells and heavy bombs gap TG is indeed a time, insurmountable.

In addition, from DH to the CJ in fact the mandate vested in the conversion, that is, TG is defined as strategic weapons to DH, that DH is not only capable of performing tactical missions, after a modification can also be competent in neighboring countries the region’s strategic strike missions, from the TG also proved another aspect of the DH is very satisfactory. But because the DH itself, on a ship (boat) is indeed difficult, so I think that new Eagles will hit the next generation of Navy general-purpose bombs, while the DH will continue to develop the long-range strategic direction.

About Navigation:

As for the middle of navigation, I feel the should be very simple, because if war breaks out, our enemies will certainly use the GPS, so add a GPS terminal Beidou data reference should not be strenuous to do, some time ago has been reported Beidou Americans in the code-breaking In fact, the same anti-push, of course, of course, after landing terrain matching, digital maps, can hardly be less than TG.

As for the GPS, we just need it to do general location of the middle to provide our Beidou is active positioning, GPS is a passive, so we can Beidou based, GPS (even China yards), giving the frequency in order to reduce the use of Compass reduce the electromagnetic signal characteristics, while ensuring accuracy. Of course, in order to CJ’s warhead of view, that the normal level is already good enough, then high, then meaningless.

About Accuracy:

Test when the target is a n-storey building (I always thought it was a local construction team to build packages), the impression has been repeatedly simulated munitions warhead K several times, although every time 1xxx kilometers away in the launch, but the basic can be played in the 2-4 layer (a high degree of under-center) in the central region of

As for the high-level information is being withheld and what

I have seen and heard only by me, said:

“Very many”

We are talking about them altogether are successfully developed several years ago, the equipment, the existing the-art pointed eggs can not say that.

China's CJ-10 cruise missiles

China's CJ-10 cruise missiles

China's CJ-10 cruise missiles

China's CJ-10 cruise missiles

China's CJ-10 cruise missiles

China’s CJ-10 cruise missiles

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Incoming search terms:

  • CJ-10
  • china missile
  • cj-10 cruise missiles
  • chinas cj-10
  • cj-10 missile
  • China cruise missiles
  • missile cj-10
  • DH 10 missile
  • dh-10 cj-10
  • dh-10 missile RANGE

Leave a Reply